Pairwise ranks your list of needs by importance and satisfaction, from quick two-at-a-time choices, and plots them on an opportunity matrix. See the unmet needs worth building for.
Type your list of needs, features or jobs to be done. Or bring in the groups from a card sort in one click, named and described by Graham.
Each person makes quick two-at-a-time choices, one tap each, built for the phone in their hand. It takes a few minutes and needs no account.
Every need lands on an opportunity matrix, ranked by opportunity, with a confidence range and Graham's report.
Most people do this on their phone, and the two-at-a-time format is made for it. One tap picks the winner. No sliders, no long grids, no research jargon. That simple choice, repeated, is what makes the ranking reliable.
Every need is measured twice. One group of people tells you how much it matters. Another tells you how well it is met today. Plot the two together and the opportunities appear in the top left: the needs people care about a lot and are underserved on.
When the responses are in, Graham turns the matrix into a client-ready insight report, so you can share a clear decision with the data behind it.
Already run a card sort? Turn its final groups into a pairwise study in one click. Graham brings the group names and descriptions across, so a long list of raw needs becomes a short list of themes, ranked by opportunity, without retyping a thing.
See card sortingUse pairwise to decide what to build first, to prioritize needs, features or jobs to be done, and to find the unmet needs customers care about but are underserved on. If you are still discovering how customers group a messy list, start with a card sort, then bring the themes here. If the question is whether people can find something once it is in your navigation, that is a Findability study, not a prioritization one.
It shows participants two items at a time and asks which matters more. A run of quick, easy choices adds up to a reliable ranking of the whole list, without asking anyone to rate twenty things on a scale they will not use consistently.
A plot of every need by how important it is against how well it is met today. The needs that are important and poorly served are your unmet needs, and that quadrant is where the opportunity sits.
Use pairwise when you want importance and satisfaction together, so you can find gaps rather than just an order. Use Best-Worst when the list is long and you want one clean, forced ranking of what matters most.
Around 30 completed responses per dimension for a directional read, and 100 or more per dimension before you bet a roadmap on it. Measured against our own scoring, pairwise needs about twice what a card sort does, because each person sees each item only three times. At 30 the ranking is solid, but roughly one need in four still lands in the wrong quadrant of the opportunity matrix, and that is what you decide from.
Yes, in one click. Graham carries the sort's group names and descriptions across as the items to rank, so nothing is retyped and nothing is lost in translation.
Each choice is two options and one tap, and the flow is built for the phone in their hand. That is why people finish it, which is the part that decides whether your data is any good.
Set up a pairwise study today. Graham will help you get going.
Start your free study